“Correct collective memory”的版本间的差异
来自China Digital Space
| 第1行： | 第1行： | ||
== Zhèngquè jítǐ jìyì | [[正确集体记忆]] == | == Zhèngquè jítǐ jìyì | [[正确集体记忆]] == | ||
| − | [[File:正确集体记忆-1024x777-1.png|thumb|right|''Sharing the "correct collective memory" of China's response to [[COVID-19]] with the world | + | [[File:正确集体记忆-1024x777-1.png|thumb|right|''Sharing the "correct collective memory" of China's response to [[COVID-19]] with the world (Weibo)'']] |
The record of history as approved by the Chinese party-state. | The record of history as approved by the Chinese party-state. | ||
| 第7行： | 第7行： | ||
The Party's monopoly on the history became the target of netizen scorn on June 8, 2020, after Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying was questioned in a press briefing about a recent State Council Information Office white paper that provided a glowing account of Beijing’s coronavirus response, and defended against international criticism of its [https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/01/public-anger-swells-over-official-opacity-on-coronavirus/ opacity and misinformation]. Hua replied, "China issued the white paper not to defend itself, but to keep a record. The history of the combat against the pandemic should not be tainted by lies and misleading information; it should be recorded with the '''correct collective memory''' of all mankind." The official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Weibo account also shared her answer. [https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/06/netizens-mock-beijings-claim-that-history-shouldnt-be-tainted-by-lies/ Netizens have questioned the meaning of "correct collective memory," recalling Beijing's track record of lies and misinformation, which MOFA sometimes spreads to the world]: | The Party's monopoly on the history became the target of netizen scorn on June 8, 2020, after Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying was questioned in a press briefing about a recent State Council Information Office white paper that provided a glowing account of Beijing’s coronavirus response, and defended against international criticism of its [https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/01/public-anger-swells-over-official-opacity-on-coronavirus/ opacity and misinformation]. Hua replied, "China issued the white paper not to defend itself, but to keep a record. The history of the combat against the pandemic should not be tainted by lies and misleading information; it should be recorded with the '''correct collective memory''' of all mankind." The official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Weibo account also shared her answer. [https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/06/netizens-mock-beijings-claim-that-history-shouldnt-be-tainted-by-lies/ Netizens have questioned the meaning of "correct collective memory," recalling Beijing's track record of lies and misinformation, which MOFA sometimes spreads to the world]: | ||
| − | + | @海怪先生遛犀牛: On January 3, you were still admonishing [[Li Wenliang|Dr. Li]]. So, why was December 27 reported [in the white paper] as the time it was given high-priority? | |
| − | @Cherubear: I want to know, what correct memories are left with the families of those patients who died before they could get into a hospital? | + | @Cherubear: I want to know, what correct memories are left with the families of those patients who died before they could get into a hospital? |
| − | @Tin_Oxide: Whatever the case, I’ve set up a folder to store a whole bunch of incorrect memories. [[https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/06/netizens-mock-beijings-claim-that-history-shouldnt-be-tainted-by-lies/ Source]] | + | @Tin_Oxide: Whatever the case, I’ve set up a folder to store a whole bunch of incorrect memories. [[https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/06/netizens-mock-beijings-claim-that-history-shouldnt-be-tainted-by-lies/ Source]] |
The [https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/07/cdt-censorship-digest-june-2020-a-power-struggle-over-memory/ CDT June 2020 Censorship Digest gathers analysis of the "correct collective memory" phenomenon] and its connection to Beijing's "[https://chinadigitaltimes.net/china/positive-energy/ positive energy]" push. | The [https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2020/07/cdt-censorship-digest-june-2020-a-power-struggle-over-memory/ CDT June 2020 Censorship Digest gathers analysis of the "correct collective memory" phenomenon] and its connection to Beijing's "[https://chinadigitaltimes.net/china/positive-energy/ positive energy]" push. | ||
[[Category:Lexicon]][[Category:Official Discourse]][[Category:COVID-19]] | [[Category:Lexicon]][[Category:Official Discourse]][[Category:COVID-19]] | ||
2021年5月25日 (二) 18:39的版本
Zhèngquè jítǐ jìyì | 正确集体记忆
Sharing the "correct collective memory" of China's response to COVID-19 with the world (Weibo)
The record of history as approved by the Chinese party-state.
The Party's monopoly on the history became the target of netizen scorn on June 8, 2020, after Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying was questioned in a press briefing about a recent State Council Information Office white paper that provided a glowing account of Beijing’s coronavirus response, and defended against international criticism of its opacity and misinformation. Hua replied, "China issued the white paper not to defend itself, but to keep a record. The history of the combat against the pandemic should not be tainted by lies and misleading information; it should be recorded with the correct collective memory of all mankind." The official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Weibo account also shared her answer. Netizens have questioned the meaning of "correct collective memory," recalling Beijing's track record of lies and misinformation, which MOFA sometimes spreads to the world:
@海怪先生遛犀牛: On January 3, you were still admonishing Dr. Li. So, why was December 27 reported [in the white paper] as the time it was given high-priority?
@Cherubear: I want to know, what correct memories are left with the families of those patients who died before they could get into a hospital?
@Tin_Oxide: Whatever the case, I’ve set up a folder to store a whole bunch of incorrect memories. [Source]
The CDT June 2020 Censorship Digest gathers analysis of the "correct collective memory" phenomenon and its connection to Beijing's "positive energy" push.
