个人工具
视图

“Program-think”的版本间的差异

来自China Digital Space

跳转至: 导航, 搜索
(Created page with "<!--HEADER: Pinyin of Chinese names and terms; link to corresponding Chinese page, if one exists (replace "中文" with page name)--> ==biān chéng suí xiǎng 编程随想...")
 
第9行: 第9行:
  
 
<!--BLOCKQUOTE: HIT SPACE ONCE TO AUTOMATICALLY CREATE BLOCKQUOTE-->
 
<!--BLOCKQUOTE: HIT SPACE ONCE TO AUTOMATICALLY CREATE BLOCKQUOTE-->
  Phasellus mattis et dui sit amet porta. Cras eleifend ac risus ac laoreet. Maecenas scelerisque ante non nisl placerat malesuada. Fusce varius urna at rhoncus finibus. Curabitur congue justo eget metus euismod, vitae blandit purus luctus. Vestibulum lorem lorem, dapibus tempus tellus vitae, ornare sagittis metus. Curabitur lobortis risus neque, eu bibendum nisl malesuada sit amet. Duis vitae luctus diam. Maecenas lobortis libero odio.
+
   
 +
<blockquote>
 +
==== Why the Authorities Can’t Catch Me–A Summary of My Security Experience After Ten Years of Anti-Party Activities ====
  
Nunc rutrum tempor mi eu tempor. Fusce ante turpis, fringilla in velit blandit, feugiat pulvinar ligula. Sed porttitor magna ligula, vel maximus risus interdum id. Phasellus facilisis ex eu volutpat mattis. Phasellus suscipit tempor malesuada. Curabitur malesuada porta tempor. Nam a risus augue. Proin turpis ligula, vulputate et placerat vel, gravida ut odio. Nunc pretium urna vel velit blandit accumsan. Nunc convallis id enim ut dictum. Nulla venenatis ut diam ut placerat. Nunc nec odio hendrerit, mollis neque et, posuere sem. Vestibulum ipsum velit, lobortis blandit ipsum sit amet, laoreet condimentum lectus. Donec nec erat pretium, tempus ligula et, scelerisque nisi.  
+
[https://chinadigitaltimes.net/chinese/605062.html January 31, 2019]
 +
 
 +
I haven’t been online for several days, and some readers have expressed concern that something might’ve happened to me. Not to worry! I was still replying to comments as of the 21st. As of the time of publishing of this blog post, within a 14-day window, my silence counts as “ordinary inactivity.”
 +
 
 +
[…] “The Imperial Court wants to catch me but cannot succeed,” which shows that my defensive measures are basically reliable.
 +
 
 +
Readers familiar with my blog know that I have been discrediting the party-state for many years (from the first political blog post to today, it has been more than 9.5 years, rounding to the nearest ten years [sic]).
 +
 
 +
I remember that many years ago, someone said something to me in the blog comment area (the following is the gist of it):
 +
 
 +
You, child, can show off on the internet because the cybersecurity police haven’t noticed you; when they turn their eyes to you, you can count your days.
 +
 
 +
At that time, many things hadn’t happened yet, and I lacked the material to refute [the commenter]. Now I can refute it confidently – the relevant departments of the Imperial Court have long been eyeing me; unfortunately, they can’t do anything about me.
 +
 
 +
If you want to see the evidence, please read the “Ten Years of Running My Blog” post from several days ago. I’ve excerpted some of the main points:
 +
 
 +
1. As early as the 2011 “Jasmine Revolution,” I published a number of blog posts on the nature of “incitement.” (Note: those articles obviously discuss the major crime of “inciting subversion of state power.”)
 +
 
 +
2. In 2016, the Imperial Court issued a government takedown request to Github in an attempt to delete the “Princeling Party Relationship Network” project that I maintained. (Note: Github has a spine, and the project is still standing today.)
 +
 
 +
3. Two state-backed attacks against my Gmail account (Note: in 2011 and 2017 respectively)
 +
 
 +
4. A large-scale “screen flooding” [spamming of the comments section] attack on the comment area of my blog in 2017. (Note: the Blogspot comment system has a CAPTCHA mechanism. To achieve the requisite rate for screen flooding, you need a lot of Fifty Centers all at the same time.)
 +
 
 +
The aforementioned signs have already proven that I am a thorn in the sides of the relevant departments of the Imperial Court.
 +
 
 +
Having expended so much breath, I want to emphasize one point–my defense measures are sound!
 +
 
 +
In other words, I dare not say that my defense measures are perfect (perfection is impossible), but at least there are no obvious loopholes. Otherwise (if there were obvious loopholes), I would either be pursued across provincial lines, or my account would be compromised. How could I “willfully discredit the Court and viciously attack the party and state leaders” over the last ten years? […] </blockquote>
 +
 
 +
Additional translated excerpts of program-think's writing have been [https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2021/06/translation-program-think-notorious-anonymous-chinese-blogger-feared-detained published on China Digital Times.]
  
 
<!--RELATED CDS ENTRIES-->
 
<!--RELATED CDS ENTRIES-->

2021年6月25日 (五) 13:18的版本

biān chéng suí xiǎng 编程随想

Program-think's Blogspot Page (Source)

Program-think is an anonymous Chinese hacktivist-blogger. For more than 12 years, they maintained a Blogspot page where they posted content including domestic political commentary, how to evade China's Great Firewall, and exposés and criticism of high-ranking officials in the Chinese Communist Party. In addition, program-think also frequently wrote on a wide range of popular social science issues in the fields of history, sociology, and psychology. From May 9, 2021, program-think ceased to be active on their blog and all of their social media accounts, sparking fears among readers and activists that the blogger may have been identified and detained by Chinese authorities.


Why the Authorities Can’t Catch Me–A Summary of My Security Experience After Ten Years of Anti-Party Activities

January 31, 2019

I haven’t been online for several days, and some readers have expressed concern that something might’ve happened to me. Not to worry! I was still replying to comments as of the 21st. As of the time of publishing of this blog post, within a 14-day window, my silence counts as “ordinary inactivity.”

[…] “The Imperial Court wants to catch me but cannot succeed,” which shows that my defensive measures are basically reliable.

Readers familiar with my blog know that I have been discrediting the party-state for many years (from the first political blog post to today, it has been more than 9.5 years, rounding to the nearest ten years [sic]).

I remember that many years ago, someone said something to me in the blog comment area (the following is the gist of it):

You, child, can show off on the internet because the cybersecurity police haven’t noticed you; when they turn their eyes to you, you can count your days.

At that time, many things hadn’t happened yet, and I lacked the material to refute [the commenter]. Now I can refute it confidently – the relevant departments of the Imperial Court have long been eyeing me; unfortunately, they can’t do anything about me.

If you want to see the evidence, please read the “Ten Years of Running My Blog” post from several days ago. I’ve excerpted some of the main points:

1. As early as the 2011 “Jasmine Revolution,” I published a number of blog posts on the nature of “incitement.” (Note: those articles obviously discuss the major crime of “inciting subversion of state power.”)

2. In 2016, the Imperial Court issued a government takedown request to Github in an attempt to delete the “Princeling Party Relationship Network” project that I maintained. (Note: Github has a spine, and the project is still standing today.)

3. Two state-backed attacks against my Gmail account (Note: in 2011 and 2017 respectively)

4. A large-scale “screen flooding” [spamming of the comments section] attack on the comment area of my blog in 2017. (Note: the Blogspot comment system has a CAPTCHA mechanism. To achieve the requisite rate for screen flooding, you need a lot of Fifty Centers all at the same time.)

The aforementioned signs have already proven that I am a thorn in the sides of the relevant departments of the Imperial Court.

Having expended so much breath, I want to emphasize one point–my defense measures are sound!

In other words, I dare not say that my defense measures are perfect (perfection is impossible), but at least there are no obvious loopholes. Otherwise (if there were obvious loopholes), I would either be pursued across provincial lines, or my account would be compromised. How could I “willfully discredit the Court and viciously attack the party and state leaders” over the last ten years? […]

Additional translated excerpts of program-think's writing have been published on China Digital Times.

See Also

More from CDT